Strengthening dialogue and linking research to practice and policy remain core commitments in all SSRC programs. Social Media and Democracy Research Grant grantees were selected from around the world based on their qualifications, research questions and methods, and commitment to accountability, transparency, and excellence. An international body of peer reviewers selected proposals submitted prior to November 9, , and without input from Facebook.
For the latest on the status of the data, please see the announcement posts from Facebook and Social Science One. Sloan Foundation. More information on the peer review processes and ethical protections behind this project can be found on the SSRC project page. Social Science Research Council. The SSRC is an independent, international, nonprofit organization. It fosters innovative research, nurtures new generations of social scientists, deepens how inquiry is practiced within and across disciplines, and mobilizes necessary knowledge on important public issues.
Social Sciences - Research Topic Ideas - LibGuides at University of Michigan
Support the SSRC. Items is a space for engagement with insights from the work of the Council and the social sciences. The Immanent Frame publishes interdisciplinary perspectives on religion, secularism, and the public sphere. Calls for Content on The Immanent Frame. Oaths are dangerous and necessary. Kujenga Amani facilitates the exchange of ideas about diverse aspects of peacebuilding in Africa. Candidate Support. Candidate Traits and Positions. Catholics and Catholicism.
Christians and Christianity. Church-State Law. Country of Origin. Criminal Justice.
- Political Science Research Guide: Major Political Science Journals.
- Social Science Research Methods (International Relations) (MSc).
- Political Science.
- Titles of interest.
- Secondary menu.
- Fantastic Park (Smartboys Club Book 8).
- Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Volume 3 Analysis of the Sexual Impulse, Love and Pain, The Sexual Impulse in Women (TREDITION CLASSICS).
Data Labs. Disasters and Accidents. Discrimination and Prejudice.
Domestic Affairs and Policy. Economic and Business News. Economic Recession. Economics and Personal Finances. Educational Attainment. Elections and Campaigns. Emerging Technology Impacts. Energy and Environment.
Evangelical Protestants and Evangelicalism. Family and Relationships. Federal Government. Foreign Affairs and Policy. Future of the Internet.
What is Political Science?
Gay Marriage and Homosexuality. Generations and Age. Global Balance of Power. Global Migration and Demography. Globalization and Trade. Government Spending and the Deficit. Hindus and Hinduism. Household and Family Structure. International Governments and Institutions. Immigration Attitudes. Immigration Trends. Income Inequality. Individualism and Individual Opportunity. Information Seeking. International Organizations. International Survey Methods.
International Threats and Allies. Internet Activities. Jews and Judaism. Leisure Activities. Life Satisfaction. Marriage and Divorce.
Media Performance. Media Revenue Models. Blind peer review by scholars and editors continues to be the gold standard for research evaluation, but the system is far from perfect. As an example, a recent study found that women researchers are less likely to be selected as reviewers. The number of researchers worldwide is rising at a rate of about 4 percent per year. Many high-quality journals and academic presses have already opened discussions about criteria for publishing decisions. A central question involves how to value and elevate research results beyond those perceived as most original, counterintuitive, or intriguing, which the current system privileges.
These criteria can provide incentives for cherry picking results, thereby misrepresenting the actual state of knowledge on a particular research topic. Such priorities also undervalue the importance of confirming results and null findings. The increasing quantity of submissions has another consequence: the slow pace of reviewing and publishing papers.